The opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of PokerNews.

Numbers are unbiased. You can sabotage a formula and move variables around to manipulate numbers, but if the math is right, then numbers are unbiased. If a roulette wheel comes up red 50 times in a row, that doesn’t mean that “black is due.” If you’re playing poker and there has been a on the flop for three hands in a row, that doesn’t mean that “sixes are hot.” The numbers don’t change.

On Thursday, Alexandre Dreyfus, the CEO of the Global Poker Index, announced that the GPI suspended Jean-Paul Pasqualini and Cedric Rossi. The two players were removed from the rankings, and the suspension is “clearly stated on their player profile page.” Dreyfus goes on to say he believes poker still has its best years ahead of it.

“I’m not simply a believer. I’m investing a lot of money into this goal, to make the GPI a respectable tool for promoting poker players and poker playing performance.”

PokerNews reached out to Dreyfus for a few questions after the suspensions were announced, and Dreyfus discussed further the dangers of “opening Pandora’s Box.”

“Indeed, the GPI is a poker ranking authority. We are not an ethics committee or a body able to judge morality. Whatever is done outside the table or not related to the game doesn’t affect the GPI.”

I love Dreyfus’ attitude and his ambition. I also love his idea of developing a private “Player Trust Rating” that would be shared among casinos, because player protection and safety are paramount. However, because you simply can’t deny numbers, I wholeheartedly disagree with removing Pasqualini, Rossi and anyone else from the GPI rankings. You can blackball a player from the community, and you can warn casinos of their shady doings, but you can’t make a player’s statistics disappear into thin air.

In 1961, Roger Maris hit 61 home runs, breaking Babe Ruth’s single-season home run record by one. New York sportswriter Dick Young suggested that an asterisk be placed next to the record because Maris played in 162 games while Ruth played in 154, but the asterisk was omitted. For 37 years the record stood, and then the steroid era in Major League Baseball began.

In 1998, Mark McGwire (70) and Sammy Sosa (66) both broke the single-season home run record. In 2001, Barry Bonds hit an incredible 73 home runs, snatching the record away from McGwire, and after the 2007 MLB season, Bonds retired as the all-time home run king with 762. All three players have been connected to performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs), and McGwire admitted to using steroids in 2010.

Bonds, McGwire, and Sosa have not been removed from the record books. You can find their names on MLB.com and in the National Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, New York. None of these players are members of the Hall of Fame, and that’s perfectly OK.

It would be absurd for MLB to deny that these seasons happened or that Bonds destroyed 73 baseballs in 2001, captivating all of baseball in the process. It is acceptable and sensible for the baseball writers to deny Bonds’ entry into the Hall of Fame, and they have. They have also denied McGwire, Sosa, Roger Clemens, and other suspected users.

Subjectivity is welcomed when selecting members for the Hall of Fame, but there can only be objectivity when dealing with statistics.

Team sports, particularly in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA), are more susceptible to statistical punishments. In 2012, the Ohio State Buckeyes football program was hit with a myriad of sanctions. Their entire 2010 season, including their Sugar Bowl victory over Arkansas, was vacated, and the university’s share of revenue from the Sugar Bowl win was forfeited. The Buckeyes were banned from post-season play in 2012, including the B1G Championship Game, and Urban Meyer’s team finished a perfect 12-0.

Despite breaking NCAA rules and having previous wins vacated, the Associated Press didn’t ignore Ohio State. The AP ranked the Buckeyes throughout the season, and the team finished third in the country at the end of the season behind only Oregon (2) and Alabama (1).

The greatest example for Dreyfus, and anyone else who believes that players can be removed from the rankings, is Lance Armstrong. Armstrong, who participated in arguably the dirtiest sport on the planet and competed against teams and countries that absolutely hated him, had his seven Tour de France victories vacated by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency and the International Cycling Union. Armstrong’s 14-year cycling career vanished into thin air. If you go to LeTour.com, you’ll see they don’t even list race winners from before 2010. The only tab you can click is “Race Winners Since 2010.”

The entire website has been de-Armstrong’d.

Is that justifiable, though? If you follow me on Twitter, you know I am completely anti-Armstrong. I think he’s arrogant, I think his appearance on Oprah was a joke, and I think it takes a real scummy person to hide behind this large of a lie for a decade. Having said that, can his seven wins be erased that easily? When cycling enthusiasts discuss the history of the sport they love, do they just omit an entire decade?

Armstrong will never cycle again – nor should he. But his seven wins, many of which came against other cyclists who were using PEDs, can’t fade into oblivion.

Dreyfus is great for poker. The GPI has revolutionized the way we rank players. The GPI Player of the Year will soon become – if it hasn’t already – the most important annual award in our industry. The Fantasy Poker Manager is ingenious, and has already become very popular on Facebook. But there is no need to remove Pasqualini and Rossi from the rankings unless you want to send some kind of message to the community. The rankings are the rankings. If players are found to be cheating and are no longer allowed to play in tournaments, then their ranking will plummet anyway.

I encourage Dreyfus to continue to better our community, and again I love the idea of a private “Player Trust Rating” that would be shared among casinos, but removing players from the rankings is unnecessary.

Get all the latest PokerNews updates on your social media outlets. Follow us on Twitter and find us both Facebook and Google+!

Check out the original source here! Originally from PokerNews.com

The Global Poker Index has announced the suspensions of Jean-Paul Pasqualini and Cederic Rossi after video evidence revealed suspicious activity. The suspensions will result in both men being removed from the GPI rankings and having their player profile pages branded “suspended.”

“We debated it internally for the last ten days, ever since we learned of it, like everyone else. It was, and remains, a very complicated decision to make,” GPI CEO Alexandre Dreyfus said when announcing the suspensions. “By taking this action, we are not claiming that we know they cheated – this is up to the casinos and the overseeing regulatory bodies to decide. What we are convinced of is that there wasn’t fairness at the table. Unfair behavior will not be promoted via the Global Poker Index. It goes against everything I’m trying to do to promote poker, players and events.”

The suspicious activity occurred during the 2009 Partouche Poker Tour Main Event, and a video compilation, put together by Nordine Bouya, shows what appears to be collusion between Pasqualini and Rossi, who are both French, but hail from Corsica, by using hand signals. That video can be seen below. Pasqualini and Rossi went on to finish in first and second place, respectively, in the tournament.

Jean-Paul Pasqualini

“Recently, some information was made public about a very suspicious incident of cheating, which in poker is equivalent to fraud,” Dreyfus explained. “We spent a lot of time analyzing the facts, checking the accuracy of the video and its sources. We also solicited the point of view of the GPI’s top 50 players. The feedback from the industry and the players has been very clear – they were in support of suspending Jean-Paul Pasqualini and Cedric Rossi from inclusion in the Global Poker Index.”

While the GPI has suspended players in the past, such as disgraced Partouche cheater Ali Tekintamgac, this is the first time suspensions have been doled out since Dreyfus acquired the company eight months ago.

“I realize that it can be a slippery slope, but that is why we have acted very cautiously and in accordance with a set of standards that we are holding ourselves to,” Dreyfus said. “The first is that, in order to suspend anyone, there must be evidence to support that decision. It cannot be based on rumors – those are easy to come by, evidence isn’t.”

He went on to add: “What we are advocating is fairness at the table, not necessarily off-table ‘ethics.’ I remember the Ethics Committee, or something like that, from the now defunct Epic Poker League. I don’t want to go there. I cannot impose my own ethics upon others. I won’t judge a person’s lifestyle. The Global Poker Index is meant to rank poker players on their performance. If the performance is distorted or compromised, then we act. At this stage, we can’t do much else. I was pleased that this decision was supported by so many of the people I spoke to, because it means that none of us want to see this behavior on table.”

In addition, Dreyfus explained his desire to establish a Player Trust Rating that casinos could use. This suggestion will be discussed this summer when the GPI holds a large meeting during this year’s World Series of Poker. At the meeting, players and event organizers will be able to discuss players’ interests.

Cederic Rossi (Picture courtesy of PartouchePokerTour.com)

“I understand that casinos are generally well-equipped to look out for their own interests, but I think it is time for the poker community to also utilize the tools they have at their disposal to protect fairness and their own interests,” Dreyfus said. “Poker has historically suffered from a bad image because of a widespread cheating culture. We’ve come a long way in recent years to get away from that, but unfortunately it still happens, and probably always will. That’s why it is time to fight it. It will take time to develop the measures we have in mind, but we can do it, especially with support from the players. They are the ones who pay and play, and they have to be more involved in these issues.”

PokerNews spoke briefly with Dreyfus, who was kind enough to answer some questions:

PokerNews: In the article, you mentioned that you “realize that it can be a slippery slope, but that is why we have acted very cautiously and in accordance with a set of standards that we are holding ourselves to.” With the possible opening of Pandora’s Box on this issue, are the offenses you deem punishable by suspension limited strictly to poker-related offenses? For example, what if a player robs a bank or commits murder and is convicted, are those grounds for suspension from the GPI?

Dreyfus: Indeed, the GPI is a poker ranking authority. We are not an ethics committee or a body able to judge anything about morality. Whatever is done outside the table or not related to game doesn’t affect the GPI.

You go on to discuss the money poker players spent in tournaments and across the globe in the past. Poker players also spend money in online poker. Given the effects of such an event like Black Friday, what is the GPI’s stance on figures such as Howard Lederer, Chris Ferguson, Russ Hamilton or even Erick Lindgren? If these players begin to play tournaments once again and have success, will they be ranked?

Yes, they will. They haven’t cheated on a poker table and don’t distort the live poker game. But first, they would need to have good results, so let’s wait.

What do players have to do to get past the suspension and back into the good light of the GPI in order to be ranked once again?

This is a topic that will be raised during a GPI meeting at the WSOP this summer.

With the GPI being the most extensive and critical ranking system we have in poker, as the man in charge do you feel an obligation to the entire poker community to get such strong stances in instances like this?

Yes, I do believe that it is a need for the players and the industry. Ten years ago, players were spending $62MM in buy-ins, now it is $906MM. We need industry standards and policy. It was not necessary before, but I believe it is now – and yes, the GPI and all the projects we are going to run in the next few months are aiming to achieve that, becoming a ‘poker body.’

Is there anything else you would like to add?

It will always be difficult to have a federation or something similar, so I believe that the GPI can work with poker players to support and lead actions to promote a better poker environment. It is very important to try to build a network of casinos in Las Vegas, the U.S. and Europe that will use the GPI Player Trust Rating to avoid having ‘unwelcomed’ players in tournaments. The best way to limit cheating is to make people aware. That’s what GPI will do, in partnership with casinos and players.

Here’s a look at the aforementioned video compilation:

Get all the latest PokerNews updates on your social media outlets. Follow us on Twitter and find us both Facebook and Google+!

Check out the original source here! Originally from PokerNews.com