Fri, 01/07/2011 – 20:22 – PokerPages Staff

Poker Voters of America are set to unveil a third online poker bill for the state of California this week.

The intrastate lobby group has confirmed that the bill will be a variation of the bill endorsed by Senator Rod Wright last year but with a poker only focus.

Poker Voters President Melanie Brenner spoke of the subtle changes made to the bill in an interview earlier this week.

“The bill is different from Wright’s bill, it has taken out limits on the number of operating hubs and introduces a further income distribution component, granting further benefits to stakeholders such as tribes.”

Wright introduced his own bill last month alongside the legislation proposed by the California Online Poker Association (COPA) headed by the Morongo Tribe.

Brenner admitted that the moves by other parties to put forward respective bills had taken them by surprise. The Poker Voters had an agreement that they would be informed of any significant developments.

Wright’s bill stalled in June last year following opposition from the Morongo and other card clubs as it would have put offshore sites and Las Vegas casinos in control of online gambling in the state.

Brenner believes it is now an urgent matter with the crippling deficit set to take its toll on California during the coming months.

The bill is currently sponsored by Assemblyman Jerry Hill though Brenner revealed they are hoping to secure the backing of a figure in the Senate who ‘will be more of a champion of it.’

2011 January 01, Barry Carter

You have already probably made a ton of resolutions, and if they involve poker no doubt they also involve trying to make as much money as possible. We want to help give you the best start possible so check out our guide to the best ways to pump up that bankroll in 2011.

$50 Free No Deposit Bonus on PartyPoker

Thousands of happy Club PokerNews players have already done it, now is a great time for you to make the most of our exclusive Free $50 No Deposit Bonus with PartyPoker. You literally do not have to deposit any cash or give your bank details to get your free $50 and what’s more, you will also get a free month at PokerNews Strategy on top of the money!

Just follow our Party Poker Free $50 Walkthrough Guide to get in on the action.

€10,000 New Year Freeroll – Only 11 Rake Hands to Play!

Start the new year how you mean to go on, with this generous €10,000 freeroll which guarantees €2,011 to the winner and cash prizes to anyone in the final 500. The tournament takes place on January Sunday 9 2011 and has a cap of 2011 players.All you need to do is download Betclic Poker, make a deposit of €20 or more and play at least 11 raked hands between December 6 and January 2
Download BetClic

Full Tilt $100,000 First Deposit Freeroll

Most poker rooms offer a generous starting bonus to get you going at the tables (Just like the $600 bonus that Full Tilt offer) but nobody else offers an exclusive $100,000 freeroll for first depositors every month. Not only will you be playing in a 100k tournament, the field is likely to be soft, as it will be rife with new players.
Sign Up to Full Tilt Poker

Unibet €1,000 Bonus for Every PokerNews Player

Without doubt one of the most generous sign up bonuses you will ever see. Whether you deposit €1,000 or just the bare minimum, PokerNews players will be rewarded with a €1,000 first deposit bonus. You can’t find a sign up bonus like this anywhere else and it’s a guaranteed grand as long as you play long enough.
Sign Up to Unibet Poker

Sell a Piece

Exercise good bankroll management and take shots in games you normally wouldn’t, by lowering your variance by selling your action. Sign up a new account on ChipMeUp where you can sell percentages of your online or live play and also buy the action of some of the best players in the world.
Go to ChipMeUp

Lock Pro Supremacy

The first big PokerNews Freeroll series of 2011 and potentially one of the best. There will be four exclusive $7,500 freerolls starting in January, but that’s just the start. Not only will you get to play alongside the elite team at Team Lock Poker Pro, bust one and you will win a $100 bounty. There will be 25 pros per tournament so you stand to win big money even if you don’t make the money.
Sign Up to Lock Poker

Rush Poker

Yes, we know, it’s been almost a year since this innovative game was introduced and many think they have it solved already. However this still has the potential to be one of the softest games of 2011 and we will tell you why = mobile phones. Rush Poker Mobile has recently been introduced and we think that with it will come a wave of degenerate gamblers wanting a poker fix on the move. Continue to play it on your computer and have a huge edge on people who should be doing something else on the move.
Sign Up to Full Tilt Poker

Bookmark Our Freerolls Page

2010 was an enormous year for Club PokerNews players with hundreds of thousands of dollars of freerolls, many of which were five figures. In 2011 the emphasis is going to be on bigger and better, as we plan on having the biggest prize pools you can find anywhere. No more $500 freerolls with 2000 people in them, watch this space for some of the biggest free tournaments in poker.
Go to our Freeroll Page

2011 January 01, Donnie Peters

Coming into 2010, the poker industry was looking to advance the cause for official legalization and licensing. From the beginning of the year, everyone was involved in a giant waiting game, and no one really knew what to expect when June 1, 2010, would roll around. That was the date the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act was set to kick in.

Most of those involved in poker in one way or another cared and followed the headlines but were often tossed back and forth between positive and negative. First, the thoughts of legalized intrastate Internet poker were brought up in New Jersey and kept hopes alive, but those were again lost when Republican Scott Brown proved victorious over Obama-backed state Atty. Gen. Martha Coakley in a special election to fill the deceased Ted Kennedy’s U.S. Senate seat. Then California became a player in the legalization of intrastate Internet poker and things swayed back toward positive.

Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) was one of those thought of to be on the fence about Internet gaming. In February, it was revealed that the Senate Majority Leader appeared to have his legs dangling over the edge favoring online poker. He supported the delay of the UIGEA and this came to the attention of the Poker Players Alliance. The PPA was so encouraged that the organization began donating money for the Senator’s reelection, something previously only done with Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), who introduced the Senate bill to license and regulate poker.

More toward the end of February, legislation to license and regulate Internet gambling has been tied to a bill with larger implications. That bill was the Bipartisan Tax Fairness and Simplification Act introduced by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Judd Gregg (R-NH). As advertised, the bill would simplify and reform the U.S. tax code. To pay for the tax cuts outlined in the bill, a provision to license, regulate and tax the Internet gambling industry was made. Two things were very important about this move. First, the bill was introduced by a member of each party, which gave a lot of encouragement to many. Second, it set a precedent for Internet gambling legislation to be attached to other interests, much like the UIGEA got through the Senate in 2006, which caused this entire mess. This was great news to those in poker as it meant that if legislation to license and regulate Internet gambling can continue to be attached to other bills as a way to generate the revenue needed for a larger plan, it only takes one successful vehicle for online poker to gain official legalization in the U.S.

Moving forward to the next month, the hopes of poker advocates took another hit when, according to Congressman Barney Frank, the UIGEA regulations would not receive another delay from the Treasury Department. Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) made a power play to block President Obama’s Treasury nominee from taking office and it worked. The UIGEA would come into effect on June 1, 2010. The compliance date for the regulations had already been delayed once for six months but wouldn’t be allowed a second extension.

What was the PPA going to do about this? After successfully petitioning for the delay that extended the compliance deadline on UIGEA regulations to June 1, the PPA would now focus its efforts going forward not on delaying,but on refining the final version.

Others were working during the month of March, as well. Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) reintroduced his Internet Gambling Regulation and Tax Enforcement Act toward the end of the month. The bill wasn’t said to be one that would compete with Frank’s legislation, but rather one that the two Congressman worked on together. The plan would be to combine both this newly introduced bill and Frank’s Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection and Enforcement Act in Internet gambling legislation were to come to a vote in the House.

On June 1, 2010, the UIGEA regulations were to be in full effect. In the days prior, much of the poker world was descending on Las Vegas in preparation for the long haul of the World Series of Poker. Many played poker online in the U.S. and were anxiously awaiting this compliance date. When it hit, things didn’t exactly turn into the desolate wasteland that everyone feared. Instead, our own Matthew Kredell reported at one point that over 41,000 were playing cash games on PokerStars and another 17,000-plus on Full Tilt Poker. Many pros and online poker enthusiasts breathed a sigh of relief within the confines of the Rio All Suite Hotel & Casino walls knowing it was going to be just a big, dried-up desert on the virtual felt. Still, a lot might change for the worse over the next couple of weeks.

About one month after the UIGEA took full effect on the online poker world, not much had changed. The games were still going on the sites with thousands and thousands of players playing poker. What had changed was that the UIGEA was preventing U.S. citizens from depositing to online sites. Still, players found ways around it and the money went into the games. The PPA even reached out to its members and asked them to notify the organization if they were having problems withdrawing funds. John Pappas, executive director of the PPA, said that the organization hadn’t received many complaints. After all, the UIGEA was only supposed to impact transactions to the poker sites.

In July, poker players in California received some good and bad news as the online poker legislation for the state was back on the board. State Sen. Rod Wright, who introduced the California Online Poker Law Enforcement Compliance and Consumer Protection Act, surprisingly announced that he had withdrawn the bill at a June 29 hearing in the Governmental Organization Committee he chaired. Wright still planned to pursue Internet poker legislation, but wanted to sit down with interested parties to craft a bill that would receive broader support. The good news was this wasn’t the bill players were looking for, making the derailment from its path a positive.

On July 28, 2010, the House Financial Services Committee passed Frank’s Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection and Enforcement Act by a 41-22-1 vote. This was big for online poker, but not because it meant the legalization of online poker was imminent. It was big because it showed how far the fight has come. Four years prior, Congress voted 6-1 against Internet gambling in supporting the UIGEA. On this key day of the year, the committee voted nearly 2-1 in favor of the cause.

After the passage of Frank’s bill, much of the poker community was excited. Plenty were even talking about the imminent federal legalization that was next to come. Even despite this important step in the movement, there was still plenty of work to be done and a very long road ahead before Frank’s bill could become law.

At the end of August, the PPA called for action for its members to sign a letter urging Commerce Casino to change its position on Frank’s bill to federally license and regulate online poker. Commerce had representative Tom Malkasian testify in opposition of the bill during a hearing in front of the House Financial Services Committee in July. Although the bill still passed through the committee, Commerce allied itself on the side of poker enemies such as Rep. Spencer Bachus (D-Ala.) and Focus on the Family. Over 10,000 people had signed the letter including prominent professional poker players Annie Duke, Tom Dwan, Barry Greenstein, Greg Raymer, Huck Seed, Patrik Antonius, Ted Forrest, Phil Hellmuth, Phil Ivey, Vanessa Rousso, Doyle Brunson, Gus Hansen, Jennifer Harman, Howard Lederer, John Juanda, Mike Matusow, Chris Moneymaker, Phil Laak, Erick Lindgren, Chris Ferguson, Daniel Negreanu, Eli Elezra and Allen Cunningham. In that testimony, Malkasian compared operators like PokerStars and Full Tilt to a drug cartel, stating that if Congress were ever to decide to legalize marijuana, “certainly no one would suggest that the first federal permits to sell it should go to the Tijuana drug cartel since they have the most money and experience in marketing and distributing the product.”

Moving into the final part of the year, the people’s right to play poker had seen an unprecedented amount of progress. Even though Frank’s bill passed the House Financial Services Committee back in July, and it was now September, the progress doesn’t carry over from year to year. The next step was for McDermott’s Internet Gambling Regulation and Tax Enforcement Act to advance through the Ways and Means Committee. The PPA asked its members who live in the districts of Ways and Means representatives to send a PPA form letter asking for their congressmen to push for a markup and support the legislation.

Unfortunately, the bill would not get a markup in the House Ways and Means Committee prior to the November elections, according to a spokesman for the congressman, who cited a lack of time in the committee schedule. The markup was seen as the next big step toward federally licensed and regulated online poker but not getting the markup done before the end of the regular congressional schedule just adds to the already long odds for federal Internet poker legislation to pass through both houses in the little time remaining this year.

Also in September, Washington upheld a 2006 law that makes it a felony to play online poker in the state. Lee Rousso, the PPA Washington state director, challenged the law, but the judges ruled against him. Rousso had challenged the law as a violation of the commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution, which prohibits states from passing legislation that discriminates against interstate commerce. Rather than attempting the challenge the ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court, Pappas believed a legislative route to be the best chance to overturn the law. When the law was passed in 2006, the PPA was in its formative stage and there was no organized poker lobby, leading Pappas to believe the PPA could help block such legislation if it were introduced today. After the ruling, the two most prominent sites, PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker, stopped serving people in the state.

On the opposite side of the coin as Washington state, the New Jersey Senate passed the Internet gambling bill in November by an impressive 29-5 margin. The bill would license and regulate online poker within the state and even though this movement seemed stagnant for the past few months amidst everything else that was going on, was a big step forward. Shortly after the bill passed in New Jersey, California looked as though it was ready to follow in the same footsteps.

With a month left to go in 2010, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid did his best ability to get a law passed to legalize, license and regulate Internet poker. Reid had been working hard on a behind-the-scenes deal with Senate and House leaders to attach an Internet poker bill to larger legislation guaranteed to pass in the lame-duck session the way poker’s opponents attached the UIGEA to the SAFE Port Act in 2006. According to Pappas, if the bill is attached to a larger bill, that is a sign the deal has been reached in both houses and that government-sanctioned Internet poker will become a reality.

The rumors that were floating around all year about Reid’s move to support online poker seemed to be true now. Still, the bill wasn’t going to be perfect, and a lot of poker players were worried about one big thing: a proposed 15-month blackout period before the first licenses would be granted. This is meant to give time for U.S. casinos and other companies that want to be involved to get their websites together and to essentially reboot the Internet poker industry so that all sites begin on a level playing field. This worried a lot of people and made plenty of them question whether or not they would want the bill passed.

Will it pass? Won’t it pass? Back and forth it went. But then in mid December, the effort of Reid took a fatal blow, but no one could really put a finger on to why it died. Many even believe that because of the various leakings of the bill every few days it had more life on poker message boards and news sites than it ever did on Capitol Hill.

Reid’s push to insert anything into the bill for online poker was severely limited because ofcPresident Obama’s handling of negotiations for the Democrats. This makes it hard to believe that this bill had any leverage still alive when the word got out. Rather, it was likely dead by the time the poker community got word of it.

Our own Mathew Kredell reported that Obama announced Monday, December 6, that an agreement had been reached with Republican leaders to extend the Bush-era tax cuts. On December 8, the Las Vegas Sun quoted Reid as saying “we’re not able to” in response to being asked if he would be adding legalization of online poker to his objectives during the lame-duck session, then later that day withdrew the story because a Reid spokesman had called and said it was still on his agenda and that the quote was in response to another question, though there were no other questions audible on the Las Vegas Sun reporter’s tape. It’s possible that Reid really had already thrown in the towel, but his aides pointed out that he shouldn’t say that publicly and make it look like he’s not putting in the effort for the casinos that contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund his re-election campaign.

Pappas told PokerNews in the middle of December that Reid’s negotiations on the bill broke down late December 9 after House Democrats made it clear they would not pass a tax bill that included any attachments. So, at the very least, poker media and message boards were keeping the bill alive for nearly a week after Reid had waived the white flag.

The most important factor to come out of this saga is that Harry Reid, the highest ranking member of the Senate, finally came out publicly behind licensed and regulated online poker. That’s something to build on for the future, especially moving into 2011.

On the other hand, the poker community had a wild, up-and-down ride in 2010 when it comes to online poker legislation. If 2010 is any sign of what’s to come in the future for online poker, the only thing that is really for certain is that the road is a long, bumpy one and the legalization of online poker will be very difficult to come by.

Follow us on Twitter for up-to-the-minute news, and also become our fan on Facebook.