November 11 2011, Donnie Peters

A few days ago, the world watched Team PokerStars Pro Pius Heinz conquer the World Series of Poker Main Event and win $8,715,638. PokerNews was able to sit down with Heinz the following day. In Part 1 of the interview, Heinz talked about how he feels as champion, and what he plans to do with the money. In Part 2, Heinz let us know how he responded to the final-table atmosphere and playing heads-up with Martin Staszko. He also discussed some of the key hands at the final table.

What was your overall reaction to the atmosphere of the final table; being under the bright lights and the cameras?

The atmosphere was just sick. It was just really, really exciting to be there.

Did you get nervous at all?

Yeah, especially when we started nine-handed play. For the first half hour, I was really nervous, which I didn’t expect before hand, but I really was. My hands were shaking when I put the chips in and all of that. It was only this half an hour where I had to get used to it.

How was it to come back to three-handed play, instead of heads-up play?

It was interesting. Obviously it went really, really fast, which nobody expected. But yeah, I think it’s a cool idea to make three people come back instead of two.

On Sunday, you took the chip lead and started to really run away with the tournament in a way. Would you have rather just played the entire final table out on Sunday as opposed to having a break with Monday off, which could possibly let the other players regroup?

No, I was actually fine with taking this break. By the time we got down to three-handed play, I was fairly exhausted. I think it was about around midnight, so we played for like 12 hours, basically. So yeah, I definitely wasn’t sad at all about taking a break.

On Tuesday, what was your reaction when you saw Ben Lamb and Martin Staszko get all the money in on the very first hand, and who were you rooting for?

Personally, as a person I was more rooting for Ben because I like him and I think he’s a great guy and I respect him a lot. Considering just what’s good for me at the poker table, I was rooting for Martin. Which doesn’t mean I want to take anything away from Martin, I think he’s a really, really good player, but Ben is just sick, you know.

How was playing heads up with Martin Staszko? He limped a lot of buttons and presumably because he felt that you’d be three-betting him a lot. Did you change you game plan when he started doing this or did you plan for him to do this?

I think, actually, this was really smart for him to do that. And I definitely had my problems with his strategy. Usually I would react just by punishing a lot of his limps from the big blind, but when you look down at three-five off every single time he limps the button there’s not much you can do.

So yeah, I think it was really smart of him to do and I definitely had my problems with this a bit because you’re really forced to play bad hands like three-five off out of position post-flop, which against a player as smart as Martin is always hard to do.

You guys played heads up for a really long time, and you didn’t have too many breaks because the final table was airing live on ESPN. Did you think you were getting tired at all? Would you have liked to have taken some more breaks?

Yeah, I mean I understand that ESPN has to run the show and all that, but definitely as a player being there – we’re playing for the difference between first and second was like, the better part of three million [dollars] – yeah, I definitely would’ve liked some more breaks.

How did you feel you were handling things emotionally when you and Martin kept trading chips back and forth? For a while it seemed as though you would grind, grind, grind, grind, take a lead and then lose one big pot and reset things.

That’s basically how it went, yeah. At some point, I definitely started to get frustrated in the match because I could just never make a hand and he did. It was really, really tough at this point, but I just tried to not lose my focus and play as well as I could and hope the cards eventually fell my way.

There are a couple hands we’d like to ask you about. The first one would be the king-queen hand where you decided to bluff-raise the river. Can you talk us through your raise on the river after checking back the turn?

Yeah, sure. First of all, my preflop play is reasonably standard. I can definitely three-bet, but I thought that I was just going to flat here. The flop play is also really standard. I have the best hand there a lot. When a nine comes [on the turn] and he checks, first of all I thought that my king-queen is good most of the time so there’s not really the need to bet a as a bluff because he’s not folding. He might fold a six sometimes, but rarely, or a hand like two fives or two fours, maybe, but that’s all I can get him to fold out. So there’s really no sense in betting.

And I thought, which I guess he disagreed because he made a really big call with kings, that by checking back I could rep a nine fairly well. I can also rep a hand like ace-ten or ace-jack, which I probably wouldn’t three-bet. I probably wouldn’t three-bet ace-queen, ace-king I probably three-bet.

We’re not sure whether you saw the coverage from last night, but when you did check back the turn and ended up raising the river, Antonio Esfandiari commented that you should never have a nine there taking that line.

OK, yeah, I disagree. I disagree pretty strongly.

Were you surprised that he called with two kings?

Yeah, I was pretty surprised. I mean, it’s just like a line people don’t take as much as a bluff that often. Usually when people float this flop with a hand like jack-ten or something, they’re going to bet the turn. That’s what you expect and that’s why you check a hand like ace-six there a lot because then you can check-call and get value from all of the floats.

When you check [behind] you kind of rep showdown value, and my showdown value on this board has got to be nine-x or ace-x. And some very, very, very small percentage of hands that I can or have to turn into a bluff on the river, which would be king-queen, king-jack, king ten and a six, basically. So yeah, I think my line makes – I’m just going to say I have a nine there fairly often.

The other hand we’d like you to talk about is the big hand, the momentum swinger in the whole match, which was your ace-queen versus Stasko’s queen-nine. Could you just talk us through that hand?

Yeah, well preflop was standard of course other than his limp maybe, but he had been doing that. When the flop comes, I flopped a gut shot. The flop is not great for my hand and there’s not even a heart, so I don’t have backdoor hearts. It’s a flop that should crush my big blind punishing range fairly hard because I haven’t been doing it at all in the whole match, that’s why I was pretty surprised by him raising. I thought he would think that I flopped a good hand here fairly often.

When he raised I was pretty perplexed, but I also had a small tell on him, I think. Which was, when he would put chips in the pot and not look at me when I was looking at him, he would fold more often than not, or have the weaker part of his range more often than not. And when he would stare back at me, he would be stronger a lot more often. So when I stared him down for maybe a minute or a minute and a half, he did not glance at me once. So I was pretty sure he had the weaker part of his range.

Looking at his range, there really aren’t that many hands that hit his limp-calling range basically. He never plays a king like that, first of all. He’s definitely raising king-ten, he’s definitely raising kings, he’s definitely raising tens and he’s definitely raising sevens [preflop]. So the only hands he could have is basically ten-seven suited or king-seven suited, maybe king-seven off, but that’s a big discounted again because I’m not really sure if he calls 5.5 million more when I only had 80 million – 33 big blinds or something – to start the hand. So basically, he just almost never has a hand that would make sense to raise on the flop. And I had a gut shot, as well, so I just went with it.

Knowing that earlier in the match he folded queen-six of hearts for a flush draw on a the flop, looking back are you surprised he called here?

Yeah, I don’t know what he was doing in that hand.

If he was raising the flop in that hand, you’d think he’d calling off there, too.

I honestly don’t know what his general idea was there. I think his line is, honestly, pretty bad there. I don’t know what his reasoning was, maybe he had a really good reason, I don’t know. He’s definitely a great player, but I just disagree with him on that line he took there. Makes no sense to me.

On the final hand, what was going through your head when the final card fell and you were officially the new world champion?

I was just really, really happy that it was over. I just went over to my rail and got hugged by everybody. I almost couldn’t breathe because everybody was hugging me so hard, and I disappeared in the big crowd. It was just an awesome moment.

After the media storm is over and your life settles back down, where are we going to see you next?

The next thing I’m going to do is play the EPT in Prague. I’m definitely really looking forward to it. And then I’m just going to play a bunch of EPTs. I’m probably not going to be traveling overseas as much to play poker tournaments because I don’t really enjoy traveling that much.

Will we be seeing you at the PokerStars Caribbean Adventure in January?

Yeah, that’s something I’m going to do. I’m definitely going to do PCA and Berlin, Vienna, the Grand Final in Madrid. Basically, almost every stop of the EPT I’m going to play this season.

Don’t forget to follow us on Twitter and like us on Facebook.

Follow Donnie Peters on Twitter – @Donnie_Peters

November 07 2011, PokerNews Staff

The biggest spectacle in poker, the World Series of Poker November Nine never disappoints, and Sunday’s game was no exception. After a four-month hiatus, the final nine players of the 2011 World Series of Poker Main Event converged on the Penn and Teller Theater in the hopes of making it to Tuesday – to be part of the final three. Pius Heinz, Ben Lamb, and Martin Staszko have kept the dream alive and are still in the hunt for the coveted bracelet.

The first elimination of the day came on the 51st hand of the day. Ben Lamb raised to 1.7 million from under the gun. Action folded to Sam Holden in the small blind and he reraised all-in for 11.125 million. Lamb made the call and turned over . Holden’s was dominated. The flop fell giving Lamb top pair and a flush draw. The on the turn left Holden drawing dead and sent him to the rail in ninth place, good for $782,115.

Shortly thereafter, Anton Makiievskyi was eliminated in eighth place. On the 59th hand of play, action folded around to Makiievskyi, who was in the small blind. He open-shoved for 10.5 million and was called by Pius Heinz in the big blind. Makiievskyi, holding was flipping for his tournament life against Heinz’s nines. The flop came down , pairing Makiievskyi’s king and putting him in the lead. The turn changed everything, however, because the fell and gave Heinz a full house. The river brought the , officially sealing Makiievskyi’s fate in eighth place. He pocketed just over $1 million for his efforts.

Heinz had a commanding chip lead after he eliminated Makiievskyi and it only continued to grow throughout the day’s action. The third elimination of the day came when Martin Staszko raised to 1.7 million and a short-stacked Bob Bounahra reraised all-in for 4.475 million. Staszko, who tabled , was ahead of Bounahra’s and stayed that way as the board ran out . Bounahra was sent to the rail in seventh place, good for $1,314,097, and his raucous Belizean contingent followed him out of the Penn and Teller Theater.

Phil Collins, who by the 73rd hand of play, had fallen to the second shortest stack at the table, moved all-in from the button for 13.575 million. He was called by Ben Lamb in the big blind holding . Collins was way behind with . The flop kept Lamb in the lead, but Collins had flopped a backdoor flush draw. The on the turn gave Collins a huge sweat, with a flush draw and an open-ended straight draw. The river kept Collins in the game when the appeared, doubling his chip stack to over 28 million, and sending his rail into boisterous cheers.

Twenty-four hands later, Eoghan O’Dea was crippled in a huge hand against Lamb. Only about two million in chips separated the two when the chips went in the middle preflop. Lamb was at risk and O’Dea was in the lead with against Lamb’s . The kept O’Dea in the lead, as did the on the turn. The river dealt the crushing blow – the – and O’Dea was left with 2.6 million. O’Dea was eliminated two hands later, in sixth place – the same finish his father had in 1983, albeit for a much smaller prize, $43,200. He was all-in preflop with against Martin Staszko who turned over pocket eights. The board was no help for O’Dea who was eliminated and took home $1,720,831.

On the very next hand, the field was reduced to four. Pius Heinz raised to 2.1 million from under the gun. Action folded to Phil Collins who moved all-in for 18.3 million. Heinz made the call, and Collins’ tournament life was on the line. Heinz held and was ahead of Collins’ . The flop gave Collins an open-ended straight draw, but Heinz was still in the lead and stayed there through the turn. Heinz turned a set, but Collins picked up more outs. None of Collins’ outs hit when the fell on the river, eliminating him in fifth place, $2,269,599. Heinz added even more chips to his already monstrous stack.

Play slowed considerably after the dinner break, but only one thing remained constant - Pius Heinz at the top of the leaderboard. However, on hand No. 156, Heinz gave away a few of his chips when he doubled up Martin Staszko. In the hand, Staszko moved all-in over the top of a raise from Heinz, who was under the gun. Heinz made the call and tabled , well ahead of Staszko’s . With the giving Staszko trips, he stayed in the lead through the turn and the river, doubling to 44 million, and leaving Ben Lamb as the short stack.

Lamb was in need of some help to keep his tournament dreams alive, and he ended up getting some at the expense of Matt Giannetti. On hand No. 174, Giannetti raised to 2.6 million from the button. Lamb reraised all-in from the big blind, and Giannetti called the 26.8 million more. Giannetti and his pocket jacks had Lamb, who tabled on the ropes. The flop fell giving Lamb a flush draw. The turn, , brought Lamb’s flush and the river was the meaningless . Lamb doubled to 55 million, and Giannetti was crippled.

Giannetti doubled on the next hand against Staszko but didn’t hold on to those chips for long. Giannetti and Lamb tangled again, but Lamb held the best of it, and Giannetti couldn’t get his pay back. The chips went in the middle preflop on hand No. 178, with Lamb holding kings and Giannetti tabling . The flop sealed Giannetti’s fate when it fell , giving Lamb quads. Giannetti fell in fourth place, pocketing $3,012,700.

His elimination set the stage for Tuesday when the final three players, Lamb, Heinz, and Staszko, will play for poker immortality.

2011 WSOP Main Event Final Table Chip Counts

Play gets under way Tuesday at 1730 PST (0130 GMT) and the PokerNews Live Reporting Team will be on hand to provide hand-for-hand coverage until a winner is crowned.

Follow PokerNews on Twitter for up-to-the-minute news.