2011 Feb 5

The title of this article should be “Broadcasting Final Tables Live, with a One-Hour Delay While Showing Hole Cards, is the Future of Poker.” That may be a mouthful, but it is necessary to add the amendment as you’ll soon discover. In addition, broadcasting live technically isn’t even the future since it already happened in January when the final table of the PokerStars Caribbean Adventure Main Event was shown on ESPN2 with a 60- to 90-minute delay. Most recently, the same feat was duplicated when the Bicycle Casino aired the final table of The Big Event on their popular Live at the Bike webcast.

While it would be nice for a final table to be broadcast live with hole cards, there are obvious security concerns that make it implausible (cheating, collusion, etc.); however, by airing it on a slight delay, the action has a chance to play out so that the aired hands no longer pose a security risk. On the flip side, it does provide the players with valuable information they can use to their advantage, an issue I’ll address later in this article. For the sake of this piece, whenever I say “live,” I’m implying that a short delay would be observed. With that said, let me tell you why I think broadcasting final tables live is a good idea.

The benefits of a live broadcast are overwhelming and hard to ignore. First, playing a final table live ensures that no one will know in advance who the winner is, and this is much more entertaining. This is in direct contrast to programs like the World Poker Tour, whose tournaments air months after the event has concluded. This time gap provides the poker media, PokerNews included, the opportunity to publicize the tournament’s outcome before fans get the chance to enjoy the action. Think of it as you would a football game. It’s not as much fun to watch a game when you know who wins compared to watching the action unfold before your eyes. The concept applies to poker tournaments, as well.

Second, a live broadcast allows the friends and family of the final tablists to share in their loved one’s special moment. For example, The Big Event final tablist Bryan Leskowitz hailed from the East coast and obviously not all of his supporters could be in California to support him. By broadcasting live, people with vested interest were able to tune in and share in a truly one-of-a-kind experience. Finally, broadcasting live opens a whole new window of opportunity for sponsors, advertisers and the like. I’m sure you can use your imagination as far as that is concerned.

While airing a final table live seems like a good idea, some critics argue that doing so is detrimental to the players. How could this be? Supposedly, it provides players with advantageous information they can use against their opponents. For example, during the final table of The Big Event, Joe Hachem often mixed it up with Taylor von Kriegenbergh by using three- and four-bets. By broadcasting live, von Kriegenbergh could simply wait for the delay to pass, watch Hachem’s antics, and adapt accordingly.

While this argument is certainly true, the counterargument is that every player has this option, so no unfair advantage is bestowed on one player over the others. If this explanation doesn’t satisfy the critics, I wonder how they’d feel if the players were allowed to pick and choose the hands they shared, which is exactly what the Bicycle Casino offered on its Live at the Bike webcast. This allowed the players to reveal or conceal whatever information they deemed fit. I’m a fan of this option, as were all the players at the final table, and I believe it should be offered in any live broadcast format.

Kelley O’Hara, who is director of marketing at the Bicycle Casino and the woman largely responsible for Live at the Bike, as well as her crew and those who arranged the PCA’s live broadcast, are not afraid of innovation. The good news is that they’ve been rewarded with both positive reviews and decent ratings. Likewise, PokerNews‘ own Gloria Balding, who was involved with introducing live streaming webcasts to poker, isn’t surprised to see the phenomenon catching on:

“I started out in poker producing live web-streamed final tables for WSOP Circuit events. At the time, this is 3-5 years ago mind you, it was very difficult to get poker players much less sponsors to comprehend the idea of a web-streamed LIVE poker tournaments. To their credit, ESPN grasped the future of broadcasting and consistently backed the ESPN360 broadcast regardless of viewership. In recent months I have been amused at how the poker community has come to embrace web-cast as the ‘next big thing’. I smile to myself knowing the long hard road it has been to get advertisers and viewers alike to grasp the game-changing aspect of internet broadcasts. The irony is most people have forgotten about my experience producing since I stepped in front of the camera for PokerNews, but the same ethos of creating content that is true to the internet is what I think keeps PokerNews ahead of the game in terms of our web-based video content. The internet is infinite. It is what entirely what viewers and websites make of it.”

Given that, it’s hard to believe we won’t see more final tables of major tournaments broadcast live in the near future. Perhaps even at the World Series of Poker. My sentiments are largely echoed in the poker community and among many of the top pros. While that is all well and good, the big question is: What do the fans think? After all, final tables are broadcast for their enjoyment.

Use the comments section below to let us know how you feel about live final tables. In the meantime be sure to follow us on Twitter and like us on Facebook.

2011 Feb 5

Day 1 of the 2011 World Poker Tour L.A. Poker Classic Main Event took place on Friday at the Commerce Casino in Commerce, California. The $10,000 buy-in event attracted 666 runners as registration was open through the first five levels of play and created a prizepool worth $6,393,600. Leading the way into Day 2 will be Mike Baxter. The hedge fund manager and recreational high stakes player wrapped up the day with 125,400 in chips.

As expected, there were plenty of big names in the field. Antonio Esfandiari, Jason Mercier, Daniel Negreanu, Faraz Jaka and Erick Lindgren were just a few of the names that showed up. Barry Greenstein, Phil Ivey and a late-arriving Phil Hellmuth also joined the mix in this star-studded field. Out of that bunch, it was Mercier whop finished with the largest stack. He was able to building his starting stack of 30,000 up to 106,625 in chips and finish in fifth place overall.

After Level 1, Mercier tweeted, “Have 72.5k already from 30k after 1 level. Lol. @lapokerclassic,” to let the Twitter world know how well he was doing. Although he didn’t give the details, Mercier did catch up with the WPT’s Kimberly Lansing after the day and he discussed how he was able to accumulate so many chips.

Mercier mentioned that he was getting three-bet a lot early on. After he opened preflop with a wired pair of sixes, an opponent three-bet him. This time Mercier made the call and the flop came down World Poker Tour L.A. Poker Classic Day 1: Baxter Leads with Mercier Not Far BehindWorld Poker Tour L.A. Poker Classic Day 1: Baxter Leads with Mercier Not Far BehindWorld Poker Tour L.A. Poker Classic Day 1: Baxter Leads with Mercier Not Far Behind. He checked and his opponent bet 600. Mercier made it 2,000 with a check-raise before the player came back with a reraise to 7,600. Mercier clicked it right back to 13,200 and his opponent went all in. Mercier called and was up against two aces. His set of sixes held on the turn and river and he won a big pot early.

Then, Mercier said he was fortunate to get pocket aces against David Paredes’ pocket kings for another 20,000 or so. His performance and Day 1 earned him RISE Clothing Player of the Day.

At the end of the day, 507 players survived to bag up chips and continue on their quest for the WPT title. Here’s a look at the top ten stacks moving into Saturday.

PlacePlayerChips
1 Mike Baxter 125,400
2 Ronnie Ebanks 121,575
3 Arkadiy Stekoeshchikov 111,000
4 Gregory Brooks 108,425
5 Jason Mercier 106,625
6 Michael DeVita 104,725
7 Tom McCormick 100,475
8 Michael Benvenuti 98,775
9 Tony Gargano 98,500
10 Gavin Griffin 96,750

The average stack sits just under 40,000 and the field is still jam packed with notables. A few others who will be returning for Day 2 are Jordan Morgan, John Racener, Ryan Daut nd Dan Heimiller. They all finished with right around and average stack. Marco Johnson is the shortest stack to make it through the day and will come back with only 1,475 chips to play with.

Day 2 begins on Saturday at noon local time. Be sure to check back with PokerNews for the recap.

For all the latest from PokerNews, be sure to follow us on Twitter and like us on Facebook.

Pages:«1...87888990919293...101»
Copyright 2011 @ ChronicPoker.com | PokerBro.com | CardWhores.com


BUY TWITTER FOLLOWERS | FACEBOOK FANS | YOUTUBE VIEWS | SOCIAL MEDIA MARKETING CAMPAIGNS    Justin Bieber costume WIGS | Justin Bieber Halloween Costume    SEO Jacksonville Florida    Personal Injury Attorney Jacksonville Florida    Orlando Plumber    Guns Transfers Jacksonville Florida    Jacksonville Dermatology    Iphone Repair Jacksonville Florida    Jacksonville Landlords    SEO Free Link Directory    World Wide Link Directory    Top Directory's List    Find A Lawyer    Directory    Find A Lawyer in California    Free Backlinks    Swip Swap Directory    Anime Directory    Naruto Shippuden Screenshots    Free PNG    Nicolas Cage is a Vampire    Xat Chat Backgrounds    AFI Vinyl    Concrete Pumps     Virgin Island Jazz Guitar    Denied Disability Help    POKER | ONLINE POKER | POKER SITES | POKERSTARS | DEPOSIT BONUS | FREE    Download YouTube Videos? | Steal You Tube Movies | youtube video downloader    UFC 120 LIVESTREAM | BET ON UFC 120 FIGHTS | 120 LIVE STREAM | FREE UFC 120 STREAM    Flights from LAX | Fly to Los Angeles | L.A. Plane tickets Prices    High PR Directory    igotitfrom.com    FREE Link Directory    Add FREE Link    Aged Domains For Sale    ADD URL Directory